<sub id="u7b13"><p id="u7b13"></p></sub>
    <p id="u7b13"><menu id="u7b13"></menu></p>
    <p id="u7b13"></p>
      <cite id="u7b13"></cite>

        久久精品夜色国产亚洲av,色狠狠综合天天综合综合,四虎国产精品成人免费久久,亚洲自拍偷拍福利小视频,一区二区三区黄色一级片,国产精品自拍一二三四区,国产在线视频不卡一区二区,91久久亚洲综合精品成人
        Hotline:400-880-1556

        English




        Comparison between GB 2626-2019 and EN 149:2001+A1:2009

        Author:中認(rèn)聯(lián)科 time:2020-06-17 Ctr:2290

        introduction

        Recently, since the three ministries have clearly required that all exported medical supplies must have a medical device product registration certificate approved by the drug regulatory authority in order to be released, many manufacturers who initially wished to obtain CE certification for medical masks through self-declaration began to export to Europe. Attention turned to protective masks. Protective masks in the EU are personal protective equipment PPE, which must meet the requirements of Regulation (EU) 2016/425, and perform performance tests in accordance with EN 149:2001 + A1:2009.

        In fact, regarding personal protective masks, there is a corresponding standard GB 2626-2019 in China, but there is no equivalent conversion relationship with EN 149, so what is the difference between the two? The following table will explain in detail the application scope, basic requirements, and testing items of the standard.

        Comparison between GB 2626-2019 and EN 149:2001 + A1:2009

        image.png

        image.png

        image.png

        image.png

        image.png

        to sum up

        As can be seen from the above table, the EU personal protective mask test standard EN 149:2001 + A1:2009 and the domestic standard GB 2626-2019 have certain similarities in test items and index requirements, such as dead space, flammability, clean and Disinfection, practical performance and product identification, etc.

        However, since GB 2626 is applicable to three types of masks, the overall inspection items will exceed EN149. In some indicators (such as: particle filtration efficiency), the requirements of GB 2626 are even higher than EN 149 (for FFP1). Therefore, it is a good strategy for manufacturers to perform performance testing in accordance with GB 2626 before submitting to EN 149 for inspection.


        Related Articles
        • What is the GB28164 report? It is indispensable for the market launch of medical device batteries.

        • Export compliance to Saudi Arabia must be seen! 2026Type-C interface mandatory testing new regulations, these products need to be prepared immediately!

        • Urgent reminder! South Korea enforces the new regulations of Type-C interface, involving 13 types of products such as mobile phones and tablets

        • China RoHS new regulations come to the ground! 10 controlled substances are officially implemented, how do relevant enterprises respond?

        Follow Us